What many companies fail to realize about cloud computing is that many of its weaknesses are exaggerated, whereas its strengths are under-reported. The utility of a strong cloud computing program is insurmountable, and the benefits of cloud computing extend into many disparate areas of business. Even some of the more popularized downsides of the cloud, like security, are essentially the product of bad publicity more than any underlying fault with the servers that cloud computing runs on. An organization with a private or hybrid cloud can wind up utilizing a service that allows them to stay entirely in control of their data while actually protecting it more from outside attacks than its previous server configuration would have. This is because security is constructed from what choices are made about the configuration of a server. There is no real connection between any particular kind of server and security.
Cloud servers can be made to be just as secure as any other type of server, according to TMCnet. This is because the measures used to keep files safe on a home or office network are fundamentally the same on the cloud. An encryption algorithm doesn't suddenly stop being useful once files are being stored on a remote host – they still encrypt files all the same. In fact, because cloud services' entire jobs are based around protecting the files that live on their servers, their security budget is likely larger than most of their clients. This means that these organizations can afford to implement even more tools on their servers to keep cyber criminals out and data stored safely within their databases. By investing in high-tech security features, cloud providers can actually provide more dependable resilience than traditional network set ups normally do, because they have more ability to invest in it.
The difference between security and obscurity
Many organizations that are contemplating their move to cloud providers may be hampered with risks. After all, if a medium-sized organization hasn't been hacked yet, why should they adopt a cloud provider when just recently Apple's iCloud was breached? The difference here is that these enterprises are not secure – they are obscure. If criminals do not know that a target exists, they will not attempt to hack that target. This doesn't mean that that specific target isn't waiting to be attacked – it simply hasn't been discovered yet. Many companies fail at keeping up strong security because they believe that they are too small to be noticed by the criminal element that exists online. But there are many hackers out there, and organizations from the smallest to the largest have something to worry about when it comes to data security. Every leak, no matter how small, can be disastrous for an organization. Utilizing something with strong security like the cloud is an excellent way for a company to prevent itself from being eventually attacked.
The advantages of mobility, scalability and agility on the cloud are well-documented, but these platforms deserve a better reputation for security as well. The best defense for most organizations is a layered approach to systems where they utilize many different utilities and techniques at once to keep their data safe. For some companies, this can be cost-prohibitive. Cloud servers, on the other hand, have security as a major running operational cost, and can afford to spend much more than any individual client could on keeping data safe. Cloud security isn't a downgrade for any company, but actually a great opportunity to protect information whilethey gain a host of other benefits.